Explain the relationship between sociology and modernity. How relevant Essay

Explain the blood between sociology and modernity. How relevant is this relationship today - Essay ExampleThe main key for the eradication of inequality is education. His views made sociology the discipline of social and individual progress by means of the spread of knowledge and its cultural dissemination. (Ward, 1994)Sociology is known as the taut and scientific study of individual and community behavior in a given society. Sociology focuses on society. Anthropology focuses on man. However, these two disciplines are inherently intertwined and closely linked. The roots of sociology are entrenched in the soil of the attainment. The Enlightenment discussed the natural philosophy of the human condition. The drive to improve the human condition shaped the self-conscious purposes of analyzing society. (Dentler, 2002)Condorcet had an probability to witness the suffering of the people. However, their analyses were lacking. The first basic principle of the Enlightenment was toleration of man, irrespective of race, religion and ethnicity. The insurgent one is freedom as opposed to feudal restraints to behavior. The third one is uniformity of human nature. The quartern one is secularism which emphasized that secular knowledge must be free from the constraints of religious orthodoxy. (Ward, 1994).The nineteenth light speed started the move for a concrete analysis of society. The developments of Darwinian Theory became the main feature of the nineteenth century. It surface the way to the emerging social sciences which focused on the concrete analysis of social, economic, and psychological events. There were efforts to exemplify and describe contemporary societies. The general school curriculum was changed by the analytical depictions of the current civilization. (Marsh and Keating, 2005)The industrial and representative revolutions are sometimes seen as the social phenomena constituting modernity. (Wagner, 1994). The notion of modernity affirms, sociologically a nd historically, that there was a discontinuity in the discourses on